Posted by: vwbusguy | October 27, 2008

Open Source Driving the Market : Net Books

For years, software and hardware have driven each other forward.  Microsoft’s Vista is a prime example.  Even with the confusion between “Vista Ready” and “Vista Capable”, it was clear:  If you want Vista, you need ‘new’ hardware.

The problem is that most PC users didn’t actually need new hardware.  For checking their email and writing papers, the Pentium 4 with Windows XP was still good enough for their needs.

Thus came the rise of NetBooks.  ASuS started offering EeePC’s with linux as a new, tiny laptop in the $300 range.  It quickly because’s best selling laptop and other PC manufacturer’s (HP, Lenovo) were quick to follow suit.

Sure they later offered XP on the EeePC, but at higher cost.  And Vista on NetBooks so far has proved to be an epic fail as consumers complain about how doggy the performance is.  What the consumer wanted was something cheap, quick, basic, and small.  All the things Vista is not.

With the proven scalability of Linux, and the fact that Microsoft’s other competitor, Apple, was able to slim OSX down enough to fit on the iPhone, Microsoft is now aiming to slim down their upcoming mainstream OS, Windows 7, to compete on NetBooks.

What this means is that the open source communities were ahead of the curve by building systems geared toward end users from the beginning, because a lot of them were built by end users to perform well on less-than-new hardware.  Now Microsoft is entering the NetBook game a day late and a dollar short.



  1. This makes me think about what we commonly see in the industry.

    I work in the IT department of a company, and every day, when I’m asked to do something, I must do it the fastest possible, being reliable, but it doesn’t matter if that’s a ugly hack.

    This seems to be very common, and that’s a pity. Because one day, you’ll get stuck, and you’ll only be able to cry watching at the other guy who did it well from the beginning but advanced slowlier…

    That’s exactly what’s happening to Microsoft. They did what the customer wanted:
    – ease of use
    – ergonomy (that’s debatable, I know)
    – beauty (that’s debatable too, I know 🙂

    But in the end, the foundations were bad, and now comes a time where they just can’t go on piling stuff…

    Now is the time to be proud of our community, who has always been behind (see features who arrived later on Linux), less used, less friendly, less loved,… but who was definitely well conceived and so is able to go on where others have to stop. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: